Formal Complaint Filed Against Rep. Bill Huizenga For Illegal Campaign Statements
January 5th, 2014
"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE"
CONTACT: BRANDON HALL VIA Email at
WestMIPolitics@GMail.com
>>>Also contact Brandon via:
Twitter
"Today, I filed a formal complaint with the Michigan Secretary of State's Office against Rep. Bill Huizenga for multiple violations of Michigan Campaign Finance Act law.
I am calling on Attorney General Bill Schuette and Secretary of State Ruth Johnson to do what should have been done 10 years ago: investigate Bill Huizenga's illegal campaign statements.
Whether
it's an anonymous $8,000 PAC donor, $6,000 in campaign money that's
missing, thousands of dollars in payments to Bill himself, or campaign
loans he won't explain, Bill Huizenga has refused to answer multiple
questions about his "Huizenga House Fund" for years.
"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE"
CONTACT: BRANDON HALL VIA Email at
WestMIPolitics@GMail.com
>>>Also contact Brandon via:
"Today, I filed a formal complaint with the Michigan Secretary of State's Office against Rep. Bill Huizenga for multiple violations of Michigan Campaign Finance Act law.
I am calling on Attorney General Bill Schuette and Secretary of State Ruth Johnson to do what should have been done 10 years ago: investigate Bill Huizenga's illegal campaign statements.
At best, Huizenga needs to answer these questions and face a substantial fine. At worst, the law says Huizenga could face up to 93 days in jail given his role as treasurer.
Make
no mistake, every single allegation in my complaint is fully backed up
by official documents, and my complaint also points to multiple,
specific sections of the Campaign Finance Act Bill Huizenga has seemingly
violated.
I
look forward to Attorney General Schuette and Secretary of State
Johnson's inquiry into this vital issue. I am confident they will put
Michiganders first and get these questions answered."
(ALL ATTACHMENTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE COMPLAINT ARE AVAILABLE ON SOS WEBSITE HERE)
Read BELOW for more information about where the process goes from here:
According to the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, Huizenga has 15 days to respond once he gets official notice the complaint was filed.
Also, "The secretary of state may extend the period for
"The secretary of state shall investigate the allegations under the rules promulgated under this act.
If the violation involves the secretary of state, the immediate family of the secretary of state, or a campaign or committee with which the secretary of state is connected, directly or indirectly, the secretary of state shall
(10) No later than 60 business days after receipt of a rebuttal statement submitted under subsection (5), or if no response or rebuttal is received under subsection (5), the secretary of state shall post on the secretary of
If the secretary of state determines that there may be reason to believe that a violation of this act occurred, the secretary of state shall, within 30 days of that determination, post on the secretary of state's internet website
(a) Refer the matter to the attorney general for the enforcement of any criminal penalty provided by this
(11) The secretary of state may commence a hearing to determine whether a civil violation of this act has occurred. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 4 of the
(12) A final decision and order issued by the secretary of state is subject to judicial review..."
###
________________________________________________________________________
submitting
a response an additional 15 business days for good cause. The secretary
of state shall provide a copy of a response received to the
complainant.
Within 10 business days after the response is mailed, the
Within 10 business days after the response is mailed, the
complainant
may submit to the secretary of state a rebuttal statement. The
secretary of state may extend the period for submitting a rebuttal
statement an additional 10 business days for good cause."
The Campaign Finance Act also says that, after that:
"The secretary of state shall investigate the allegations under the rules promulgated under this act.
If the violation involves the secretary of state, the immediate family of the secretary of state, or a campaign or committee with which the secretary of state is connected, directly or indirectly, the secretary of state shall
refer the matter to the attorney general to determine whether a violation of this act has occurred.
(10) No later than 60 business days after receipt of a rebuttal statement submitted under subsection (5), or if no response or rebuttal is received under subsection (5), the secretary of state shall post on the secretary of
state's internet website whether or not there may be reason to believe that a violation of this act has occurred.
If the secretary of state determines that there may be reason to believe that a violation of this act occurred, the secretary of state shall, within 30 days of that determination, post on the secretary of state's internet website
any complaint, response, or rebuttal statement received under subsection
(5) regarding that violation and any correspondence regarding that violation between the secretary of state and the complainant or the person against whom the complaint was filed.
If the secretary of state determines that there may be reason to believe
(5) regarding that violation and any correspondence regarding that violation between the secretary of state and the complainant or the person against whom the complaint was filed.
If the secretary of state determines that there may be reason to believe
that a violation of this act occurred, the
secretary of state shall endeavor to correct the violation or prevent a
further violation by using informal methods such as a conference,
conciliation, or persuasion, and may enter
into
a conciliation agreement with the person involved. Unless violated, a
conciliation agreement is a complete bar to any further civil or
criminal action with respect to matters covered in the conciliation
agreement.
The secretary of state shall, within 30 days after a conciliation agreement is signed, post that agreement on the secretary of state's internet website. If, after 90 business days, the secretary of state is unable
The secretary of state shall, within 30 days after a conciliation agreement is signed, post that agreement on the secretary of state's internet website. If, after 90 business days, the secretary of state is unable
to correct or prevent further violation by these informal methods, the secretary of state shall do either of the
following:
(a) Refer the matter to the attorney general for the enforcement of any criminal penalty provided by this
act.
(b) Commence a hearing as provided in subsection (11) for enforcement of any civil violation.
(11) The secretary of state may commence a hearing to determine whether a civil violation of this act has occurred. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 4 of the
administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.271 to 24.287.
If after a hearing the secretary of state determines that a violation of this act has occurred, the secretary of state may issue an order requiring the
If after a hearing the secretary of state determines that a violation of this act has occurred, the secretary of state may issue an order requiring the
person
to pay a civil fine equal to triple the amount of the improper
contribution or expenditure plus not more than $1,000.00 for each
violation.
(12) A final decision and order issued by the secretary of state is subject to judicial review..."
###
________________________________________________________________________
Brandon Hall is a lifelong political nerd from Grand Haven, and is the Managing Editor of West Michigan Politics.
Email him at WestMiPolitics@Gmail.com
:)
Photo By Darlene Dowling Thompson |
"(10) No later than 60 business days after receipt of a rebuttal statement submitted under subsection (5), or if no response or rebuttal is received under subsection (5), the secretary of state shall post on the secretary of
ReplyDeletestate's internet website whether or not there may be reason to believe that a violation of this act has occurred."
What's the address of that SOS website?