By Brandon Hall
(Email Him At WestMIPolitics@Gmail.com)
Detroit area Democrat John Conyers now faces the fight of his political life after shocking Congressional documents have revealed he repeatedly sexually harassed a staff member, then used his office budget to pay for a confidential settlement so he could cover it up.
The woman in question was given a "no show" job for 3 months and paid nearly $30,000 to keep quiet.
That's just the beginning.
Reports being published by Buzzfeed also say that Conyers publicly groped at least one employee.
Conyers also had a list of women he wanted to see, flown to DC on the taxpayer's dime, apparently for sex romps...
Conyers is the longest serving member of the House, surviving multiple scandals in his decades in DC.
To put things in perspective regarding how long he has been around, Conyers voted to impeach Nixon in 1974... and had already been in Congress for 10 years!
Check out some of the highlights from the Buzzfeed article, and be sure to check it out for a revealing look at how DC power brokers cover up their scandals...
"One of Conyers’ former employees was offered a settlement, in exchange for her silence, that would be paid out of Conyers’ taxpayer-funded office budget. His office would “rehire” the woman as a “temporary employee” despite her being directed not to come into the office or do any actual work, according to the document. The complainant would receive a total payment of $27,111.75 over the three months, after which point she would be removed from the payroll, according to the document.
In her complaint, the former employee said Conyers repeatedly asked her for sexual favors and often asked her to join him in a hotel room. On one occasion, she alleges that Conyers asked her to work out of his room for the evening, but when she arrived the congressman started talking about his sexual desires. She alleged he then told her she needed to “touch it,” in reference to his penis, or find him a woman who would meet his sexual demands.
She alleged Conyers made her work nights, evenings, and holidays to keep him company.
In another incident, the former employee alleged the congressman insisted she stay in his room while they traveled together for a fundraising event. When she told him that she would not stay with him, she alleged he told her to “just cuddle up with me and caress me before you go.”
“Rep. Conyers strongly postulated that the performing of personal service or favors would be looked upon favorably and lead to salary increases or promotions,” the former employee said in the documents.
Three other staff members provided affidavits submitted to the Office Of Compliance that outlined a pattern of behavior from Conyers that included touching the woman in a sexual manner and growing angry when she brought her husband around.
One affidavit from a former female employee states that she was tasked with flying in women for the congressman. “One of my duties while working for Rep. Conyers was to keep a list of women that I assumed he was having affairs with and call them at his request and, if necessary, have them flown in using Congressional resources,” said her affidavit. (A second staffer alleged in an interview that Conyers used taxpayer resources to fly women to him.)
The employee said in her affidavit that Conyers also made sexual advances toward her: “I was driving the Congressman in my personal car and was resting my hand on the stick shift. Rep. Conyers reached over and began to caress my hand in a sexual manner.”
The woman said she told Conyers she was married and not interested in pursuing a sexual relationship, according to the affidavit. She said she was told many times by constituents that it was well-known that Conyers had sexual relationships with his staff, and said she and other female staffers felt this undermined their credibility.
“I am personally aware of several women who have experienced the same or similar sexual advances made towards them by Rep[.] John Conyers,” she said in her affidavit.
A male employee wrote that he witnessed Rep. Conyers rub the legs and other body parts of the complainant “in what appeared to be a sexual manner” and saw the congressman rub and touch other women “in an inappropriate manner.” The employee said he confronted Conyers about this behavior.
“Rep. Conyers said he needed to be ‘more careful’ because bad publicity would not be helpful as he runs for re-election. He ended the conversation with me by saying he would ‘work on’ his behavior,” the male staffer said in his affidavit.
The male employee said that in 2011 Conyers complained a female staffer was “too old” and said he wanted to let her go."
Brandon Hall is a lifelong political nerd from Grand Haven, and is the Managing Editor of West Michigan Politics.
>>>Email him at WestMIPolitics@Gmail.com
Just who does John Conyers think he is? Roy Moore?
ReplyDeleteHey Michigan: Remember How Todd Courser and Cindy Gamrat were FORCED FROM OFFICE over an Affair (in Lansing, State Politics) and "alleged" misuse of Office Funds in relation to said Affair??? Michigan Democrats and Republicans alike forced them out. Where are the Cries for CONYERS IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION OR EXPULSION over his misuse of Federal Funds to Fly his Affairs into DC?!?!?!? #DoubleStandards Where is Debbie Stabenow, Gary Peters, and Debbie Dingell, on all these SEX SCANDALS AND MISUSE OF FUNDS?!?!? #RetireDebbieStabenow #MidTerms2018
ReplyDeleteDebbie Stabenow, of course, wants the usual (method of Burying things) to call for Committee Reviews: Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow: "Sexual harassment is always unacceptable," said Stabenow, a Democrat from Conyers' state. "This news is deeply disturbing. I support a full review of Congressional sexual harassment policies and procedures and actions to address this serious problem."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cnn.com/2017/11/21/politics/congress-response-conyers-allegations/index.html
Time to Retire Debbie Stabenow....
learn more: http://facebook.com/groups/thxalotdebbie
("Thanks Alot Debbie, NOT" - Replace Stabenow Group)
#UnsealTheDeals My congress critter is a sexual predator!
ReplyDelete